Jekyll is an open-source static site generator (SSG) that is easy to set up and known for its fast build speeds. Depending on your project re­quire­ments, another tool might be a better fit. Popular Jekyll al­tern­at­ives include Hugo, Gatsby, Next.js, Nuxt, Astro and Eleventy.

What is Jekyll and when might an al­tern­at­ive be useful?

Jekyll is an open source static site generator built in Ruby. It uses Liquid templates to transform HTML fragments, Markdown or Textile data into static HTML pages ready for de­ploy­ment. Jekyll is easy to configure, in­teg­rates seam­lessly with GitHub Pages and generates sites quickly. Due to the fact that it separates content from design, Jekyll is a great choice for blogs, doc­u­ment­a­tion and portfolio sites.

Website Builder
From idea to website in record time with AI
  • Intuitive website builder with AI as­sist­ance
  • Create cap­tiv­at­ing images and texts in seconds
  • Domain, SSL and email included

However, if you need in­ter­act­ive features, dynamic data con­nec­tions, or server-side rendering, Jekyll quickly shows its lim­it­a­tions. Large projects or workflows that require built-in features like routing or APIs, may benefit from a more flexible solution or one that offers higher per­form­ance. Which is the best Jekyll al­tern­at­ive for you will, of course, depend on your project’s specific needs.

Hugo

Hugo is an open-source static site generator renowned for its in­cred­ibly fast build times. Even very large sites with thousands of pages can be built in mil­li­seconds. Hugo is a single-binary tool written in Golang, meaning it consists of one ex­ecut­able file that contains everything needed for de­ploy­ment. Con­fig­ur­a­tion options are available in YAML, JSON, or TOML.

Thanks to mul­ti­lin­gual support and powerful taxonomy system, this al­tern­at­ive to Jekyll is flexible enough for event pages, project doc­u­ment­a­tion, and landing pages. Using Go templates, layouts and designs can be im­ple­men­ted quickly with short­codes and variable place­hold­ers.

Ad­vant­ages Dis­ad­vant­ages
Extremely fast build speeds Go pro­gram­ming language is less common
Runs on almost any platform as a single-binary No native server-side rendering or API routing
Suitable for large websites Needs ad­di­tion­al tools for complex in­ter­act­ive features
Open-source with a large and active community
Built-in support for tax­onom­ies (clas­si­fic­a­tion schemes) and mul­ti­lin­gual content

Gatsby

Gatsby is an open-source SSG based on React and GraphQL, released in 2015. It supports building SEO-optimised websites and pro­gress­ive web apps (PWAs). Content can be sourced through GraphQL queries from Markdown files, headless CMS, or APIs. Thanks to automatic code-splitting strategies, each page only loads the resources it needs, sig­ni­fic­antly improving per­form­ance for users.

A standout feature of this Jekyll al­tern­at­ive is its extensive plug-in ecosystem, offering more than 2,500 plug-ins for everything from image op­tim­isa­tion to e-commerce and analytics. With Version 4, Gatsby added server-side rendering (SSR) and Deferred Static Gen­er­a­tion (DSG), enabling dynamic content on Node.js servers. The com­bin­a­tion of a React-based framework, large plug-in library, and modern rendering methods makes Gatsby ideal for data-driven web projects.

Ad­vant­ages Dis­ad­vant­ages
Extensive plug-in ecosystem (2,500+ plug-ins) Build times grow with with more plug-ins and large datasets
Seamless data in­teg­ra­tion with GraphQL High reliance on plug-ins
Supports SSR and DSG (from Version 4) Requires knowledge of React, GraphQL and Node.js)
Built-in PWA support Potential version conflicts between plug-ins
Pre-fetching for faster page loads Tightly coupled with the Node.js ecosystem

Next.js

Next.js is an open-source React framework sup­port­ing both static site gen­er­a­tion (SSG) and server-side rendering (SSR). With the getStaticProps function, content can be generated at build time for fast delivery through CDNs (networks of re­gion­ally dis­trib­uted servers). For dynamic data fetching on every request, the getServerSideProps function is available. In­cre­ment­al Static Re­gen­er­a­tion (ISR) lets you update in­di­vidu­al pages without re­build­ing the entire site.

Next.js includes built-in API routes for server­less endpoints and op­tim­isa­tions for images, scripts, and fonts. It supports multiple styling options, including CSS modules, global CSS, SASS and Tailwind CSS. The Mid­dle­ware feature allows custom code to run before com­plet­ing a request. As an al­tern­at­ive to Jekyll, Next.js is a strong choice if you need to combine static pages with server-rendered or per­son­al­ised content.

Ad­vant­ages Dis­ad­vant­ages
Supports SSG, SSR and ISR Doc­u­ment­a­tion mainly focuses on Linux and macOS
Server­less endpoints with built-in API routes More complex setup than purely static gen­er­at­ors
Easy cloud de­ploy­ment and op­tim­isa­tion with Vercel Requires JavaS­cript and React knowledge
Automatic image, font and script op­tim­isa­tion

Nuxt

Nuxt is an open-source framework based on Vue.js offering universal rendering, combining static site gen­er­a­tion (SSG), server-side rendering (SSR) and single-page ap­plic­a­tion modes (SPA) in one de­vel­op­ment en­vir­on­ment. Nuxt pre-renders pages on the server, de­liv­er­ing a complete HTML page before Vue.js handles client-side in­ter­activ­ity. The Nitro server engine allows hosting on everything from server­less platforms to tra­di­tion­al VPS instances.

Nuxt also offers a clear folder structure, automatic component and mid­dle­ware imports, path-based routing, and in­teg­rated API routes. Built-in features like image op­tim­isa­tion, TypeScript support, and global state man­age­ment speed up complex web app de­vel­op­ment. This means, compared to other Jekyll al­tern­at­ives, Next is par­tic­u­larly well suited for projects needing dynamic content, per­son­al­ised user ex­per­i­ences and complex backend logic.

Ad­vant­ages Dis­ad­vant­ages
Universal rendering (SSG, SSR, and SPA in one framework) De­pend­ency on the Vue ecosystem
Clear folder system with auto-imports More complex than basic SSGs
Server­less backend logic with API routes Smaller community
200+ ex­ten­sions available Requires JavaS­cript and Vue expertise

Astro

The JavaS­cript framework Astro has gained pop­ular­ity among de­velopers for building fast, content-rich websites. Unlike other Jekyll al­tern­at­ives, it uses an island ar­chi­tec­ture, splitting the interface into Astro Islands – sub­com­pon­ents that can be used across different pages.

To maximise per­form­ance, Astro converts unused JavaS­cript code into HTML and offers both SSG and SSR func­tion­al­it­ies, con­fig­ur­able on a per-page basis. Astro is also framework-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any JavaS­cript framework. It can also be deployed on tra­di­tion­al servers or edge en­vir­on­ments.

Ad­vant­ages Dis­ad­vant­ages
Very small JavaS­cript bundles due to island ar­chi­tec­ture Different approach compared to tra­di­tion­al static site gen­er­at­ors
Framework-in­de­pend­ent Smaller plug-in and theme ecosystem
Simple syntax for quick on­board­ing Less ideal for highly in­ter­act­ive apps
Fast build times Complex in­teg­ra­tion with third-party systems
High flex­ib­il­ity

Eleventy

For those wanting a lean, simply struc­tured SSG software, Eleventy (often 11ty for short) is a great Jekyll al­tern­at­ive. This JavaS­cript-based generator follows a static-first philo­sophy, meaning it’s designed primarily for HTML documents that don’t need to be updated once they are loaded in the browser. That said, the software also supports dynamic websites when needed.

There are plenty of reasons to choose Eleventy. On one hand, it enables the creation of static websites without requiring the use of client-side JavaS­cript frame­works. On the other, it delivers extremely fast build times that many com­pet­it­ors can’t match. In addition, the generator supports a wide range of template languages – from HTML and Markdown to JavaS­cript, SASS, and even MDX.

Ad­vant­ages Dis­ad­vant­ages
Works right after in­stall­a­tion Requires some technical knowledge for cus­tom­isa­tion
Supports multiple template languages Smaller community
Creates static sites without a JavaS­cript framework No built-in support for in­ter­act­ive frontend com­pon­ents
Very fast build times – even with large pipelines No native dynamic JavaS­cript rendering
Go to Main Menu