Jekyll is an open-source static site generator (SSG) that is easy to set up and known for its fast build speeds. Depending on your project requirements, another tool might be a better fit. Popular Jekyll alternatives include Hugo, Gatsby, Next.js, Nuxt, Astro and Eleventy.

What is Jekyll and when might an alternative be useful?

Jekyll is an open source static site generator built in Ruby. It uses Liquid templates to transform HTML fragments, Markdown or Textile data into static HTML pages ready for deployment. Jekyll is easy to configure, integrates seamlessly with GitHub Pages and generates sites quickly. Due to the fact that it separates content from design, Jekyll is a great choice for blogs, documentation and portfolio sites.

Website Builder
From idea to website in record time with AI
  • Intuitive website builder with AI assistance
  • Create captivating images and texts in seconds
  • Domain, SSL and email included

However, if you need interactive features, dynamic data connections, or server-side rendering, Jekyll quickly shows its limitations. Large projects or workflows that require built-in features like routing or APIs, may benefit from a more flexible solution or one that offers higher performance. Which is the best Jekyll alternative for you will, of course, depend on your project’s specific needs.

Hugo

Hugo is an open-source static site generator renowned for its incredibly fast build times. Even very large sites with thousands of pages can be built in milliseconds. Hugo is a single-binary tool written in Golang, meaning it consists of one executable file that contains everything needed for deployment. Configuration options are available in YAML, JSON, or TOML.

Thanks to multilingual support and powerful taxonomy system, this alternative to Jekyll is flexible enough for event pages, project documentation, and landing pages. Using Go templates, layouts and designs can be implemented quickly with shortcodes and variable placeholders.

Advantages Disadvantages
Extremely fast build speeds Go programming language is less common
Runs on almost any platform as a single-binary No native server-side rendering or API routing
Suitable for large websites Needs additional tools for complex interactive features
Open-source with a large and active community
Built-in support for taxonomies (classification schemes) and multilingual content

Gatsby

Gatsby is an open-source SSG based on React and GraphQL, released in 2015. It supports building SEO-optimised websites and progressive web apps (PWAs). Content can be sourced through GraphQL queries from Markdown files, headless CMS, or APIs. Thanks to automatic code-splitting strategies, each page only loads the resources it needs, significantly improving performance for users.

A standout feature of this Jekyll alternative is its extensive plug-in ecosystem, offering more than 2,500 plug-ins for everything from image optimisation to e-commerce and analytics. With Version 4, Gatsby added server-side rendering (SSR) and Deferred Static Generation (DSG), enabling dynamic content on Node.js servers. The combination of a React-based framework, large plug-in library, and modern rendering methods makes Gatsby ideal for data-driven web projects.

Advantages Disadvantages
Extensive plug-in ecosystem (2,500+ plug-ins) Build times grow with with more plug-ins and large datasets
Seamless data integration with GraphQL High reliance on plug-ins
Supports SSR and DSG (from Version 4) Requires knowledge of React, GraphQL and Node.js)
Built-in PWA support Potential version conflicts between plug-ins
Pre-fetching for faster page loads Tightly coupled with the Node.js ecosystem

Next.js

Next.js is an open-source React framework supporting both static site generation (SSG) and server-side rendering (SSR). With the getStaticProps function, content can be generated at build time for fast delivery through CDNs (networks of regionally distributed servers). For dynamic data fetching on every request, the getServerSideProps function is available. Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) lets you update individual pages without rebuilding the entire site.

Next.js includes built-in API routes for serverless endpoints and optimisations for images, scripts, and fonts. It supports multiple styling options, including CSS modules, global CSS, SASS and Tailwind CSS. The Middleware feature allows custom code to run before completing a request. As an alternative to Jekyll, Next.js is a strong choice if you need to combine static pages with server-rendered or personalised content.

Advantages Disadvantages
Supports SSG, SSR and ISR Documentation mainly focuses on Linux and macOS
Serverless endpoints with built-in API routes More complex setup than purely static generators
Easy cloud deployment and optimisation with Vercel Requires JavaScript and React knowledge
Automatic image, font and script optimisation

Nuxt

Nuxt is an open-source framework based on Vue.js offering universal rendering, combining static site generation (SSG), server-side rendering (SSR) and single-page application modes (SPA) in one development environment. Nuxt pre-renders pages on the server, delivering a complete HTML page before Vue.js handles client-side interactivity. The Nitro server engine allows hosting on everything from serverless platforms to traditional VPS instances.

Nuxt also offers a clear folder structure, automatic component and middleware imports, path-based routing, and integrated API routes. Built-in features like image optimisation, TypeScript support, and global state management speed up complex web app development. This means, compared to other Jekyll alternatives, Next is particularly well suited for projects needing dynamic content, personalised user experiences and complex backend logic.

Advantages Disadvantages
Universal rendering (SSG, SSR, and SPA in one framework) Dependency on the Vue ecosystem
Clear folder system with auto-imports More complex than basic SSGs
Serverless backend logic with API routes Smaller community
200+ extensions available Requires JavaScript and Vue expertise

Astro

The JavaScript framework Astro has gained popularity among developers for building fast, content-rich websites. Unlike other Jekyll alternatives, it uses an island architecture, splitting the interface into Astro Islands – subcomponents that can be used across different pages.

To maximise performance, Astro converts unused JavaScript code into HTML and offers both SSG and SSR functionalities, configurable on a per-page basis. Astro is also framework-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any JavaScript framework. It can also be deployed on traditional servers or edge environments.

Advantages Disadvantages
Very small JavaScript bundles due to island architecture Different approach compared to traditional static site generators
Framework-independent Smaller plug-in and theme ecosystem
Simple syntax for quick onboarding Less ideal for highly interactive apps
Fast build times Complex integration with third-party systems
High flexibility

Eleventy

For those wanting a lean, simply structured SSG software, Eleventy (often 11ty for short) is a great Jekyll alternative. This JavaScript-based generator follows a static-first philosophy, meaning it’s designed primarily for HTML documents that don’t need to be updated once they are loaded in the browser. That said, the software also supports dynamic websites when needed.

There are plenty of reasons to choose Eleventy. On one hand, it enables the creation of static websites without requiring the use of client-side JavaScript frameworks. On the other, it delivers extremely fast build times that many competitors can’t match. In addition, the generator supports a wide range of template languages – from HTML and Markdown to JavaScript, SASS, and even MDX.

Advantages Disadvantages
Works right after installation Requires some technical knowledge for customisation
Supports multiple template languages Smaller community
Creates static sites without a JavaScript framework No built-in support for interactive frontend components
Very fast build times – even with large pipelines No native dynamic JavaScript rendering
Was this article helpful?
Go to Main Menu